The verdict is in – Nikon’s got a new leader in high-ISO performance: the Z 6 III. When I wrote my initial hands-on review after getting the camera in June, I’d not had time to give it serious, real-world high-ISO testing. Having fewer pixels than the Nikon Z 9 and Z 8 (24MP vs 48MP) meant larger pixels on the same size sensor, so I expected a boost in those cameras’ already impressive high-ISO quality. But over the last couple of months, I’ve been surprised at how good that quality actually is.
There are three big issues that affect how good an image can look at high ISOs. First, how new the camera is. Newer cameras often mean newer processors, newer algorithms and sometimes newer-generation sensors, all of which can improve quality. Second is the size of the pixels. Larger will almost always give you better performance at high ISOs than smaller pixels. And finally, exposure. Noise will be worse if you underexpose at high ISOs and then try to fix that exposure afterwards, on the computer (and yes, that applies to RAW captures as well as JPEG).
I first started pushing the camera at the Hartford Nationals, a disabled sports competition run by Move United, in Birmingham in July (I was also running a Sports Photography Workshop there). I didn’t go crazy with ISO, partly because I didn’t need to, and partly because I wasn’t sure yet how it would perform. It did just fine, as you can see from the photos below. So far, so good.
Next, I decided to see what I could do with it using the Nikkor Z 180-600mm f/5.6-6.3 lens at night baseball. Normally I’d never consider doing that because to get the shutter speeds I want (usually 1/1600), at f/5.6-6.3, would require me to push the ISO so high I’d get poor quality results. To test that, I went to a Royals game that I wasn’t working. That way if I failed no client would suffer. This time, the camera blew me away. I actually had to keep pushing the shutter speed higher to force the camera into using insanely high ISOs. And the photos still looked great!
After that, I had no qualms taking the camera on the Southwest photo trip I just led, as we’d be doing a lot of night photography. To make it a little more challenging, I chose to shoot with my Nikkor Z 14-30mm f/4 lens, instead of the 14-24mm f/2.8. And at 10,000 ISO (photo at the top of the arch and Milky Way was also 10,000 ISO), below, the camera didn’t break a sweat.
Does all of this mean the Z 6 III will now be my main camera? No. I’ve always believed in using the best tool for the job, and I have other Nikon cameras to choose from that are better at other things. But when it comes to night photography, or situations where I might need to shoot at really, really high ISOs (what I’d have called “insane” before), there’s no question – I’ll grab that Z 6 III.
(If you like this story, please share it with your friends and let them know about the links on photography that I post on my business Facebook page. You can also find my photos on Instagram. And if you’re curious about the workshops I teach, you can find them here. Finally, you can subscribe to this blog on my home page.)
I loved reading your take on the Nikon Z 6III. I also have the same camera and a planned trip to Monument Valley for night photography. I thought about pairing the camera with Nikon 20mm. But perhaps I will look at the pairing you used.
Thank you.
Hi Carol. The 20mm 1.8 will let you use shorter exposure times, and/or lower ISOs. But since the Z 6 III handles high ISO so well (as you saw), the 14-30mm f/4 is a reasonable option too.